County approves roughly one and a half million dollar settlement in Peralta case, prompts calls for review
Valencia County agreed to an approximately one and a half million dollar civil settlement to resolve wrongful death and wrongful action claims brought by the family of a Peralta resident. The settlement, discussed publicly December 9 and outlined in court filings, has prompted community leaders and family representatives to demand greater transparency and possible policy changes at the Valencia County Sheriff’s Office.

Valencia County reached an estimated one and a half million dollar settlement with the Peralta family to resolve civil claims stemming from events involving the Valencia County Sheriff’s Office. County officials and court documents discussed the settlement during public proceedings on December 9, and the terms were detailed in local filings that accompany the resolution of the case.
The settlement resolves the family’s wrongful death and wrongful action claims, according to records filed with the court and remarks made by the plaintiffs’ attorney at a public comment period. County legal and insurance procedures will now govern the distribution of funds and any payments to plaintiffs and counsel. County attorneys and the county insurer are expected to complete standard administrative steps that typically follow such settlements, including finalizing payment arrangements and recording the disposition in official county accounts.
Both the county administration and the Valencia County Sheriff’s Office declined additional comment while conducting an internal administrative review. That review will determine whether departmental procedures require revision and whether any personnel actions are warranted. The sheriff’s office review is separate from the civil settlement process, and any subsequent policy recommendations or disciplinary measures will be handled through those internal channels and by county oversight bodies.

Community reaction has been pronounced. Family representatives and local civic leaders called for clearer public disclosure about the facts that led to the claim and for a transparent accounting of changes the sheriff’s office will make to prevent future incidents. Several leaders urged the county to prioritize policy reviews, expanded training, and strengthened civilian oversight as next steps.
The settlement carries implications for county governance and for voters who follow public safety oversight. Liability payouts can influence county budgeting and insurance costs, and the episode may factor into public discussions ahead of local elections and sheriff oversight debates. Residents seeking more information can review court filings and attend upcoming county commission meetings where officials are expected to address administrative follow through and potential reforms.
Sources:
Know something we missed? Have a correction or additional information?
Submit a Tip

