County Considers Oversight, Future of Holmes County Senior Center
After a November levy to fund the Darb Snyder Holmes County Senior Center failed, county commissioners met with the center board to explore placing the center under county oversight. The discussion matters to local residents because it could change governance, access to grant funding, and the way taxpayer dollars are managed while services for seniors face an uncertain funding horizon.

Holmes County commissioners met with the Darb Snyder Holmes County Senior Center board on November 17 to examine options for stabilizing the center after a levy on the November ballot failed. The board and commissioners focused on whether the county should assume oversight of the center, and if so how governance, financial controls, and legal obligations would be structured.
Board chair Tabitha Strouse told commissioners the board preferred to maintain the center's mission and independence, while acknowledging ongoing financial struggles. Commissioners said they would be open to assuming oversight only if stronger financial controls and formal accountability measures were put in place. Commissioner Joe Miller stated the county would expect to appoint a new board and require regular reporting by the center manager. Commissioner Dave Hall underscored that the county might be able to pursue grant opportunities that an independent center could not access.
County oversight, as discussed, would include a board appointed by the county, reposting of positions as required by law, and clear public accountability for funds. Board members asked commissioners for written specifics on those requirements and stressed the importance of preserving the center's purpose and honoring a prior estate gift. The estate instrument recorded as a lien in 2006 designates the building as a senior center, and board leaders emphasized that this legal constraint should guide any governance change.
The senior center currently estimates it has funding to operate for about another year while pursuing solutions. That time frame frames urgent policy choices for both the center and county government. If the center were to continue as an independent nonprofit, it would face immediate pressure to identify new revenue sources or cut services. If the county takes oversight, residents would see changes in who makes management and hiring decisions, and the county would take responsibility for complying with the estate lien and maintaining services.
For local seniors the stakes are concrete. The center provides programming, meals, transportation coordination, and social supports relied upon by older residents and family caregivers across Holmes County. Disruptions or reductions in services would affect daily lives and could increase demand for other public services.
The commissioners and center leaders agreed to continue discussions and to exchange detailed written proposals. The next steps will determine whether the county takes a more direct role, whether alternative funding sources can be secured, or whether a hybrid solution emerges to protect services and public investments. Residents who use the center and taxpayers with an interest in local fiscal accountability should follow upcoming meetings where the specifics of oversight, legal obligations connected to the 2006 estate lien, and funding paths will be addressed.


