Fresno Sues More Than 40 Companies Over PFAS Contamination
Fresno filed a broad environmental lawsuit naming more than 40 companies it says contributed to PFAS contamination in the city groundwater, seeking cleanup and damages in state court. The action is intended to protect local ratepayers from long term treatment costs and to hold both global manufacturers and regional distributors financially accountable.

Fresno filed a comprehensive environmental complaint in Fresno County Superior Court, alleging that more than 40 firms designed, manufactured, distributed or used PFAS containing products that leached into soil and groundwater serving many Fresno neighborhoods. The complaint, filed on November 3, centers on contamination levels that the city says substantially exceed federal standards, and it seeks state court remedies for cleanup and damages.
The list of defendants includes global manufacturers such as 3M and DuPont alongside regional businesses and distributors. By opting out of a national class settlement, Fresno pursued its own state court claims to preserve distinct remedies and to press for financial responsibility targeted to the citys specific cleanup needs. Local officials have emphasized that the goal is to prevent ratepayers from bearing the long term costs of water treatment and remediation.
The contamination has immediate local implications. Much of Fresno relies on groundwater for drinking and household use, and elevated PFAS concentrations require additional treatment and monitoring. Municipal water authorities will face decisions about which wells to treat or take offline, the scope and duration of monitoring programs, and how to fund expanded treatment. Those choices affect household bills, municipal budgets, and local infrastructure planning.

The case also links a local public health and environmental problem to global production and distribution networks. Naming multinational manufacturers alongside regional companies frames the contamination as part of broader industrial practices that have cross border effects. For Fresno, pursuing state court claims reflects a strategy to secure cleanup resources tailored to local conditions and timelines.
A hearing in superior court has been noted as this litigation proceeds. The coming months will determine how the court evaluates claims about contamination pathways, liability for legacy chemicals, and the financial responsibility for long term remediation. For Fresno residents, the outcome will shape both water quality and who ultimately pays for protecting it.
Sources:
Know something we missed? Have a correction or additional information?
Submit a Tip

