Hyattsville Corporal Indicted on Sexual Charges, County Seeks Answers
On November 20, 2025 the Prince George's County State's Attorney's Office announced that Jonathan Monge, a corporal with the City of Hyattsville Police Department, was indicted on multiple sex related charges. The decision has raised questions about police accountability and transparency, matters that directly affect public trust and community safety in Prince George's County.
The State's Attorney's Office in Upper Marlboro announced on November 20, 2025 that Jonathan Monge, a corporal with the City of Hyattsville Police Department, has been indicted on charges including sexual abuse of a minor, second degree rape, and sex offenses in the third and fourth degree. The office noted the age of the victim and described the allegations as sensitive, and it said no additional details would be released at this time.
An indictment is a formal accusation that initiates criminal proceedings. It does not constitute a finding of guilt, and the accused is entitled to due process under Maryland law. The announcement came from the State's Attorney's Office rather than the police department, signaling that prosecutors will lead the criminal case while departmental actions and internal reviews are likely to proceed on a separate track.
For residents of Hyattsville and Prince George's County the case raises immediate questions about oversight, transparency, and departmental protocols. Incidents involving sworn officers prompt scrutiny of hiring, supervision, complaint handling, and training practices. The absence of detailed information in the prosecutor's release will increase demand for clear communication from both the State's Attorney and the Hyattsville Police Department about next steps and any administrative measures taken to address officer status and public safety.
Beyond department procedures, the indictment has potential policy implications. Elected officials and civic groups may revisit issues of civilian oversight, reporting practices, and resources for investigations of misconduct. The case could influence public debates about policing and accountability ahead of upcoming local races, and it may affect civic engagement where trust in institutions is a determinant of turnout and advocacy.
As the criminal process moves forward, residents should expect additional public filings and court dates to clarify the allegations and the prosecution's evidence. Community leaders and elected officials will face pressure to balance confidentiality for a sensitive case with the public interest in accountability.
