Sports

IOC Clears First Russian, Belarusian Athletes To Compete Neutrally

The International Olympic Committee cleared two Russian figure skaters and one Belarusian athlete to take part in the 2026 Milano Cortina Winter Olympics as neutrals, marking the first invitations to athletes from those countries after a formal eligibility review. The decision matters because it tests the IOC balance between individual athlete rights and collective accountability amid the geopolitical fallout from the war in Ukraine, with significant consequences for sport governance and the Games brand.

David Kumar3 min read
Published
Listen to this article0:00 min
Share this article:
IOC Clears First Russian, Belarusian Athletes To Compete Neutrally
Source: gdb.rferl.org

The International Olympic Committee’s eligibility panel on November 29 cleared two Russian figure skaters and one Belarusian athlete to compete at the 2026 Milano Cortina Winter Olympics under a neutral flag, the IOC said in announcements following the panel’s review. The athletes named as the first from their countries to be invited after individual assessments were Petr Gumennik and Adeliia Petrosian from Russia and Viktoriia Safonova from Belarus.

The decisions come amid ongoing restrictions and periodic reviews of Russian and Belarusian participation in international sport because of the war in Ukraine and related sanctions. The IOC emphasized that the invitations carry neutral status and conditions, and it urged national and international federations to apply the eligibility criteria consistently when deciding entries for the Games.

From a performance perspective the clearance of two figure skaters from Russia has immediate competitive implications for the Olympic field. Russian skaters have long been a central force in international figure skating, and the inclusion of athletes who have met the IOC criteria will alter calculations for event lineups and medal prospects. For organizers and broadcasters, adding athletes with proven ability can boost the level of competition and viewer interest, while also placing a spotlight on how neutrality is implemented in practice on the Olympic stage.

Industry observers say the IOC move signals a carefully calibrated approach by international sports governance, seeking to uphold principles of individual justice for athletes while maintaining pressure on state actors through targeted exclusions and conditions. That balancing act reflects a wider trend in the sports world in which governing bodies are attempting to navigate geopolitical tensions without permanently severing athletes from international competition. The approach also raises questions about consistency and transparency across different sports and federations, where eligibility thresholds and interpretations of neutrality may vary.

AI generated illustration
AI-generated illustration

Culturally the invitations expose the tensions between athletes as individuals and the role of sport as a platform shaped by national identity and global politics. For athletes from Russia and Belarus who are cleared to compete, the neutral designation strips national symbolism while still allowing personal careers to progress. For many fans and fellow competitors the presence of neutral athletes will be a reminder that the Olympics remain a contested arena for values as well as medals.

Broader social implications include the precedent this sets for how the Olympic movement handles athletes from countries subject to international sanctions or condemnation. The IOC’s insistence on consistent application of criteria places responsibility on national and international federations to interpret and enforce rules in ways that will be scrutinized by governments, sponsors and the public. As the 2026 Games approach, the initial invitations are likely to spark further debate about fairness, accountability and the future role of sport in an increasingly polarized world.

Discussion

More in Sports