Mandelson apologises to Epstein victims while denying personal culpability
Peter Mandelson apologises for systemic failures that left Epstein’s victims unheard but stops short of a personal apology for his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein.

Peter Mandelson has apologised "to those women for a system that refused to hear their voices and did not give them the protection they were entitled to expect," in his first broadcast interview since being sacked as Britain’s ambassador to the United States. The former cabinet minister stopped short of a direct personal apology for continuing a friendship with Jeffrey Epstein after the financier’s 2008 conviction, insisting he had no knowledge of criminal conduct.
Mandelson’s remarks to BBC One’s Laura Kuenssberg come amid intense scrutiny of emails unearthed during routine checks that showed supportive messages sent to Epstein following his conviction for soliciting prostitution from a minor. The government dismissed Mandelson from his post in September 2025 after concluding the newly surfaced correspondence meant his ties to Epstein were "materially different" from what had been disclosed at appointment. Christian Turner has since been named ambassador.
The legal backdrop to the episode is stark. Epstein was convicted in 2008, later charged with sex trafficking and died in a New York jail cell in 2019 while awaiting trial. Those facts have hardened public and political expectations that senior diplomats maintain distance from figures accused of sexual exploitation. Mandelson acknowledged the wider failure, characterising the system as one that "gave him protection and not them."
Pressed on his personal responsibility, Mandelson repeatedly framed any apology in conditional terms. He said he would apologise only "if I had known, if I was in any way complicit or culpable," adding, "I was not culpable, I was not knowledgeable of what he was doing." He defended his own experience of Epstein’s social circle, saying the only people he had seen at Epstein properties were "middle-aged housekeepers" and that he "never saw girls on Epstein visits."

Mandelson described his post-conviction association as "misplaced loyalty" and later called the friendship "a most terrible mistake." He said he believed Epstein’s account and that of Epstein’s lawyer at the time and now regrets that acceptance: "Now I wish I had not believed that story." He also called Epstein "an evil monster" and rejected suggestions he had knowingly ignored abuse, asking, "Do you really think that if I knew what was going on... that I'd have just sat back, ignored it and moved on?"
Downing Street sources were reported to have described Mandelson as "economical with the truth" during the vetting process. The Foreign Office cited emails in which he appeared to question the 2008 conviction as the new information that prompted his removal; Mandelson disputes that interpretation, saying he believed only that the length of sentence should be challenged. He said the emails themselves were "a shock," that he no longer possessed them at the time of his appointment, and that he understood and accepted the prime minister’s decision to remove him.
The episode has provoked cross-party unease and a pointed rebuke from within government ranks. UK Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said Mandelson’s refusal to offer a direct apology was a "missed opportunity" and that an apology "would have gone a long way." Diplomats and legal experts warn the controversy presents reputational risks beyond the individual: it raises questions about vetting standards, political judgment and the ability of institutions to centre survivors in responses to misconduct. Mandelson said he would not reopen the issue, but acknowledged that further embarrassing correspondence could still emerge and that he "can’t rewrite history," underlining the enduring diplomatic sensitivity of the affair.
Sources:
Know something we missed? Have a correction or additional information?
Submit a Tip

