Marjorie Taylor Greene to Resign from Congress, Leaving Seat Vacant
Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene announced today she will resign her House seat on January 5, 2026, citing sustained internal Republican divisions and personal safety concerns. Her departure crystallizes an escalating rift within conservative politics, with implications for primary dynamics in Georgia and for House operational planning ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.

Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene announced in a lengthy social media video and accompanying statement today that she will resign from the U.S. House of Representatives, with her final day set for January 5, 2026. Greene attributed the decision to a combination of personal and political factors, saying she no longer wanted to endure ongoing infighting within the Republican conference and the fallout from a public dispute with former President Donald Trump.
In her statement Greene reiterated longstanding conservative priorities including border security, Second Amendment protections, opposition to expansions of abortion policy and criticism of foreign aid. She said repeated attacks, death threats and being labeled a "traitor" after her support for releasing certain Justice Department files known as the so called Epstein materials made her position untenable. Greene also cited a desire to avoid a bruising primary fight and to protect her family as factors in her decision.
The resignation removes a high profile and polarizing figure from the House for the final weeks of the current session and opens immediate questions about how her seat will be filled. Under Georgia law the vacancy will remain until arrangements are made for a replacement or a special election. State officials and party leaders in Georgia will determine the timing and process for selecting a successor, a decision that will shape the district contest heading into the 2026 campaign calendar.
Greene's announcement follows weeks of public tension between her and Mr. Trump that amplified internal Republican disputes over strategy and loyalty. The episode has underscored fault lines within the conservative movement over tactics, messaging and the centrality of the former president in primary politics. For Republican leaders in Washington, the coming vacancy will require adjustments to committee rosters and to floor vote arithmetic for any closely contested measures, and it will remove a potent rhetorical voice from the right flank of the conference.
Responses from across the political spectrum were swift. Supporters framed Greene's exit as a forced choice driven by threats and ostracism, while critics argued the resignation reflected accountability for contentious conduct and fracturing leadership within the party. Local and national operatives will now pivot to assessing the likely field of candidates and the degree to which the contest becomes another referendum on Trump aligned influence.
Beyond immediate electoral calculations the departure sharpens broader institutional debates about safety and civility in public life, and about how parties police internal dissent. Greene's resignation will be a point of reference for lawmakers weighing the costs of high profile confrontation, and for voters in her district considering whether to reward continuity or change when a successor is chosen.


