Perry County Officials Report Major Increase In Road Sign Thefts
Perry County Fiscal Court alerted residents to a surge in road sign thefts and said it will boost monitoring in areas where thefts have been concentrated, a development that officials say raises safety and maintenance concerns. The increase matters for residents because missing or damaged signs can impair driver safety and add unplanned costs to the county budget.

Perry County officials on November 18, 2025 announced they are responding to a rise in road sign thefts across several parts of the county, saying the trend has created safety hazards and additional maintenance burdens for local government. A post from the Perry County Fiscal Court described a "major increase" in sign thefts and indicated the court will increase monitoring in hotspots where thefts have been concentrated.
Local officials did not provide a tally of stolen signs or name specific roads affected, but they emphasized that the pattern is widespread enough to prompt stepped up attention. Missing stop signs, speed limit markers, and other traffic control devices can increase the risk of collisions, complicate navigation for visitors and emergency responders, and slow response times for first responders. Replacing signs also consumes materials and labor dollars that come from the county maintenance budget, potentially reducing funds available for routine road work.
The Fiscal Court statement urged residents to be vigilant and to report suspicious activity. Increased reporting can help authorities identify patterns, establish times and locations where thefts are most frequent, and allocate monitoring resources accordingly. County maintenance crews are tasked with inventorying damaged and missing signs and scheduling replacements, while Fiscal Court members are expected to weigh the budgetary impact as part of upcoming fiscal deliberations.
Theft of public infrastructure poses both operational and policy questions for local government. For Perry County the immediate policy implications include short term responses such as targeted monitoring, increased reporting, and expedited sign replacement. Over the medium term the issue could influence decisions about material choices for signs, placement strategies, and enforcement priorities. Fiscal Court members who oversee county spending may need to consider whether to reallocate funds from planned projects to cover recurring replacement costs or to pursue grants and state assistance for traffic safety improvements.
Community engagement will play a critical role in limiting further thefts. Residents who notice missing or damaged signs help prioritize repairs and inform enforcement activity. Schools, civic organizations, and neighborhood watch groups can also contribute by reporting incidents and raising public awareness about the safety consequences.
As county officials increase monitoring, residents are encouraged to stay informed through Fiscal Court communications and to report incidents to local law enforcement and county offices. The extent to which enhanced monitoring reduces thefts will shape both short term public safety outcomes and future budget and policy discussions at the Fiscal Court.


