Push to Restore Amtrak Service at Marks Seen as Economic Opportunity
Local leaders and federal officials have repeatedly raised the prospect of restoring passenger rail service to Marks, including a flag stop on Amtrak's City of New Orleans route, as a vehicle for economic and tourism development. The proposal remains an ongoing planning objective in county materials, but its advancement depends on decisions by rail operators and coordination with track owners.

Efforts to bring back passenger rail service to Marks have resurfaced frequently in local planning documents and federal statements, reflecting a persistent belief among officials that a stop could stimulate economic activity and heritage tourism in Quitman County. County news pages recount an Amtrak ribbon cutting and indicate long standing interest in rail access for Marks as part of broader development strategies. At the federal level, U.S. Sen. Roger Wicker has urged consideration of a Marks stop and referenced discussions with Canadian National and Amtrak.
The proposal under consideration would operate as a flag stop on Amtrak's City of New Orleans route, meaning trains would stop at Marks only when passengers have reserved boarding or alighting. While proponents point to tourism and economic development potential, the exact status and timetable for a new or resumed stop are unresolved. Any change would require agreement among Amtrak, the track owner Canadian National, and other rail operators, along with compliance with safety and operational requirements.
For residents, the debate has practical implications. A functioning passenger stop could increase visitor traffic, support local businesses, and provide another transportation option for residents who travel regionally. County officials have framed the idea as part of a heritage tourism strategy, citing historical ties to rail and past public events tied to passenger service. Those planning objectives appear repeatedly in county materials and past federal statements, signaling institutional continuity in pursuit of rail access.
Policy and institutional hurdles remain central to the discussion. Rail operator decisions drive service patterns, and track owners control access and infrastructure changes. Funding for platform work, accessibility upgrades, signage, and coordination of schedules must be negotiated and secured. Federal advocacy can help elevate the proposal and encourage coordination, but delivery depends on technical, operational, and fiscal agreements among multiple parties.
The recurring nature of the Amtrak and Marks proposal makes it a visible local development theme for voters and civic stakeholders. Its progress could shape local economic projections and influence how officials prioritize transportation and tourism investments. Residents and local leaders seeking clarity on next steps will need continued engagement with county planning processes and communication with federal and rail operator representatives.
As of November 23, 2025, the possibility of a Marks stop remains under consideration, with its future tied to decisions by Amtrak and track owners and to the outcome of ongoing local and federal advocacy.

