News

Referees Saw Paddle in Half, Check Legality During Match

At a Courted Series event in Miami on December 26, 2025 referees took the extraordinary step of sawing a competitor's paddle in half to inspect the core during a singles match. Officials cleared the paddle as legal, returned it to the player, and the match continued, a dramatic moment that underscores growing scrutiny around equipment compliance.

Jamie Taylor2 min read
Published
Listen to this article0:00 min
Share this article:
Referees Saw Paddle in Half, Check Legality During Match
AI-generated illustration

During a singles match at the Courted Series event in Miami on December 26, 2025, Thomas Shields raised concern about the power of opponent Anna Bright's shots and requested a paddle inspection. Tournament referees examined Bright's paddle on site and proceeded to cut it open to inspect the internal core, a move rarely seen in competition. After analysis officials determined the paddle met regulations and returned it to Bright, who played multiple points with the paddle split open.

The incident drew immediate attention for its visual drama, but it also raises practical questions for players, coaches, and tournament organizers. Equipment checks are a recognized part of tournament procedures, and this episode highlights that inspections can extend beyond surface examinations. Organizers, referees, and players now have a clear reminder that physical inspection of paddle cores may occur if there is reason to suspect noncompliant construction.

For players the practical takeaway is straightforward. Bring current manufacturer documentation and any proof of purchase or compliance when you compete. Be prepared for a thorough inspection if an opponent or official raises concerns. If a paddle is taken for inspection expect referees to follow whatever procedures the tournament has established, which may include removing the paddle from play until it is cleared. In this case the paddle was returned after being cut open, but outcomes can vary depending on the findings and the specific rule set a tournament enforces.

Tournament directors should review their inspection policies and communicate clearly to competitors how equipment challenges will be handled. Clear procedures reduce confusion during matches and help maintain player safety when physical inspection becomes necessary. Referees and event staff also need tools and training for handling evidence and reporting results in a way that stands up to later review.

The split paddle also offers an unexpected visual lesson for the community. Inspecting the core reveals the materials and construction that can affect ball response and durability. Coaches and club players who buy new equipment will benefit from paying attention to manufacturer claims about core materials and construction methods, and from testing paddles on court before competition play.

This Miami moment will likely be discussed at local courts and league meetings in the coming weeks. Whether it prompts formal rule changes or simply sharper enforcement, the event demonstrates that equipment compliance is no longer only about surface measurements. It can be a visible, high stakes part of match play.

Know something we missed? Have a correction or additional information?

Submit a Tip
Your Topic
Today's stories
Updated daily by AI

Name any topic. Get daily articles.

You pick the subject, AI does the rest.

Start Now - Free

Ready in 2 minutes

Discussion

More Amateur Pickleball News