Humanitarian researchers assessing the situation in North Darfur say mass killings are likely continuing in El-Fasher in the wake of the city’s recent capture by the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), underscoring a renewed and acute threat to civilians in an area long battered by conflict. The assessments, reported by The Times of Israel, come amid chaotic security conditions that have hindered independent verification and the delivery of urgent aid.

El-Fasher, the capital of North Darfur, has been the scene of chronic ethnic and armed violence since the wider Sudanese conflict erupted. The RSF’s takeover of the city, occurring days before researchers issued their warning, has reportedly coincided with reports of targeted attacks on neighborhoods, displacements, and a collapse of basic services. With communications disrupted and humanitarian corridors obstructed, relief agencies face mounting difficulties in reaching affected populations and documenting alleged crimes.

For decades Darfur has been the focus of accusations of mass atrocities, and the latest developments risk reviving those worst fears. Under international law, deliberate attacks against civilians, extrajudicial killings and widespread or systematic assaults could constitute crimes against humanity or war crimes, potentially invoking the jurisdiction of international mechanisms such as the International Criminal Court. However, legal accountability depends on access to evidence and impartial investigations — conditions made more precarious by the fluid frontlines and political fragmentation in Sudan.

The resurgence of violence in Darfur unfolds against a backdrop of competing international crises that are drawing diplomatic energy and media attention. In a parallel development, Turkey announced plans to host some foreign ministers of Muslim-majority countries amid concerns over a ceasefire in Gaza, a diplomatic convening noted by The Times of Israel on Oct. 31. The day before, remains of two Israeli hostages returned from Gaza were repatriated, and images from Israel’s border showed widespread destruction in the Palestinian territory, underscoring how multiple theaters of violence are pressing on international attention simultaneously.

This confluence of crises complicates prospects for a coordinated international response to Sudan. Regional organizations, including the African Union, and the United Nations face logistical and political hurdles in mounting effective interventions while donors and diplomatic capitals juggle acute humanitarian needs elsewhere. Neighboring states may also feel the strain; historically, Darfur’s upheavals have produced cross-border refugee flows and frictions with Chad and other Sahelian neighbors, risks that could intensify if mass civilian harm continues.

Researchers and humanitarian actors argue that immediate steps are needed to secure humanitarian access, preserve evidence, and protect civilians. Absent greater international engagement and robust monitoring on the ground, the pattern of violence that once devastated Darfur risks repeating. As attention oscillates between Gaza and Sudan, the human toll in El-Fasher may be mounting largely out of view, posing urgent questions about the global community’s capacity to prevent and respond to atrocities in multiple simultaneous crises.