State Names Officer Who Fired During Charlestown Police Stop
The New Hampshire Attorney General’s Office publicly identified Charlestown Police Officer Jacob Sands as the officer who discharged his service weapon during a Nov. 14 traffic stop and confrontation. A 23 year old man identified as Christian Paquette was hospitalized and faces charges, and the AG continues its investigation into the use of force.
Charlestown residents were informed this week that the New Hampshire Attorney General’s Office has identified the officer involved in a police shooting connected to a traffic stop on Nov. 14. The incident began when officers attempted to stop a speeding vehicle that lacked a license plate, and it escalated into a confrontation during which a 23 year old man allegedly attacked officers with a knife.
The Attorney General’s Office named Charlestown Police Officer Jacob Sands, a six year department veteran, as the officer who fired his service weapon. The man involved, identified by the state as Christian Paquette, was hospitalized after the encounter and now faces charges related to the incident. The Attorney General’s Office is continuing its investigation.
Authorities have released these key facts while investigators work to assemble a full record of events, including witness statements, medical reports, and any available video or body camera footage. The public release of the officer’s name marks a significant step in transparency for a case that has drawn attention across Sullivan County. Families and community members have expressed concern about safety and accountability, and local officials have said they will follow the legal process.
For residents, the immediate community impact includes questions about roadside safety and police protocols during stops of vehicles without registration. The case also underscores broader issues of use of force and how investigations are handled when firearms are discharged by law enforcement. The ongoing inquiry by the Attorney General’s Office will determine whether the use of force met legal standards and whether any further charges or departmental actions are warranted.
As the investigation proceeds, local leaders and police officials face the challenge of balancing public information needs and the integrity of the legal process. Updates are expected as prosecutors and investigators review evidence and decide on next steps. In the meantime, the naming of the officer and the disclosure of basic facts give Sullivan County residents a clearer picture of what occurred and why the matter remains under active review.
