In a high-profile ceremony broadcast internationally, President Trump and representatives of more than a dozen countries endorsed a Gaza peace framework intended to halt the latest round of intense fighting and begin a staged process of reconstruction and political negotiation. The plan calls for an immediate, monitored cease-fire, the exchange of prisoners and hostages on a phased timetable, the opening of secure humanitarian corridors into Gaza and the creation of an international trust fund devoted to rebuilding civilian infrastructure.

White House officials said the measures are designed to stabilize the enclave quickly and to create space for a longer-term political arrangement. "Today we take a step toward ending the suffering of innocents," Mr. Trump said in brief remarks. "This plan provides safety, reconstruction and hope where there was only violence."

Yet the celebration was muted. Hamas, which controls Gaza and has been the primary nonstate actor in the conflict, did not sign the pact and denounced it as an outside imposition. The Palestinian Authority, effectively sidelined from Gaza since 2007, issued a cautious statement welcoming humanitarian commitments but insisting that any lasting resolution must respect Palestinian rights and self-determination.

Israeli officials expressed guarded support for elements of the plan — particularly the security guarantees and international monitoring — but emphasized Israel would not cede control over its border security. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office said further details must be negotiated "to protect Israeli citizens and ensure the defeat of terrorism."

The agreement tasks the United Nations and a coalition of regional partners with verification and oversight, and envisions the deployment of a mixed multinational stabilization mission within weeks. It also proposes a mechanism for conditional disbursement of international funds linked to the cessation of hostilities and adherence to human-rights safeguards.

International legal and diplomatic experts warned that pledges on paper will be tested by realities on the ground. "Signing a plan is the easy part," said Hina Shamsi, a legal analyst on conflict and human rights. "The crucial questions are who enforces it, how violations are adjudicated, and how victims' rights and war-crimes accountability are preserved even as reconstruction goes forward."

The International Criminal Court has ongoing inquiries related to past hostilities in the region, and human-rights groups said the new plan must not be allowed to obstruct investigations or to provide impunity. António Guterres, the U.N. secretary-general, welcomed the initiative but urged that it "must be accompanied by full respect for international law."

Regional powers that had helped broker the deal, including Egypt and Qatar, framed the pact as a pragmatic compromise to prevent further civilian catastrophe and to create a diplomatic opening. Yet analysts noted the arrangement leaves core political issues—Palestinian statehood, Israeli security doctrine and the status of Gaza—in limbo.

For ordinary Gazans, the measure could mean access to food, medicine and power if implemented; for politicians and diplomats it represents the start of arduous bargaining. Implementation will hinge on cooperation from nonstate actors, robust international monitoring and sustained funding—elements that have faltered in past efforts. As observers cautioned, the fragile cease-fire and the promises of reconstruction will stand or fall on a week-by-week test of will and credibility by all parties involved.