Disney invests in OpenAI, licenses characters, demands Google stop
The Walt Disney Company invested one billion dollars in OpenAI and signed a three year licensing pact that will let ChatGPT and Sora generate short clips using more than 200 Disney, Pixar, Marvel and Star Wars characters. The move came the same day Disney sent a cease and desist letter to Google alleging large scale copyright infringement, a dual strategy that could reshape the economics of creative labor and control over cultural icons.

On December 13, 2025, Disney completed a blockbuster strategic shift in its approach to artificial intelligence by investing one billion dollars in OpenAI and agreeing to a three year commercial license that brings more than 200 characters from Disney, Pixar, Marvel and Star Wars into OpenAI products. The agreement grants OpenAI the right to use specified Disney properties within its Sora social video platform and within ChatGPT features, allowing users to generate short clips and other content that feature licensed characters. Disney also received warrants to purchase additional OpenAI equity as part of the transaction.
The partnership is not limited to consumer facing tools. Disney employees will gain access to OpenAI technology for internal use, including to support film production and to accelerate certain creative workflows. The companies said the deal includes guardrails designed to prevent licensed characters from being placed in inappropriate or harmful situations during AI generated content creation.
The deal represents a new revenue pathway for studios that have long relied on box office and streaming subscriptions. By turning intellectual property into a licensable layer for generative models, Disney stands to monetize fan creativity directly while extending the life and reach of its franchises. At the same time the arrangement signals a validation for OpenAI as a platform competing with major cloud and technology firms for cultural content partnerships.
The arrangement was announced concurrently with a cease and desist letter sent to Google that accused the company of using Disney content to train its AI models without authorization and of distributing infringing images and videos to consumers through its AI tools. The letter states "Disney will not tolerate the unauthorized commercial exploitation of its copyrighted characters and works" and demanded that Google halt the alleged activities. The letter was a demand for remediation rather than the start of a lawsuit, but it follows a pattern of enforcement by Disney against other AI companies that it and other studios say have used protected works without permission.
The twin moves crystallize a paradox the entertainment industry now faces. Studios are racing to monetize artificial intelligence by licensing creative assets while simultaneously pursuing legal measures to stop what they view as unauthorized exploitation. Emarketer analyst Ross Benes warned the alliance will "inevitably invite backlash from labor groups in the entertainment industry" though he noted union leverage may be limited against rapid technological momentum.
Beyond commercial calculations, the deal and the legal action raise deeper cultural and social questions. Making Disney characters widely available in generative tools democratizes creation and could spark a new wave of grassroots storytelling, fan art and niche content that expands franchise relevance. At the same time it concentrates control in the hands of corporate gatekeepers who will shape acceptable uses through license terms and algorithmic constraints. That dynamic will affect not only revenue flows but also who gets credit and compensation for creative contributions.
As studios pursue licensing frameworks and legal challenges to define the boundaries of AI training and output, regulators and courts are likely to play a central role in setting the rules of the road. For now Disney has chosen a two track strategy of monetization and enforcement that may set the template for how cultural giants navigate the age of generative AI.
Sources:
Know something we missed? Have a correction or additional information?
Submit a Tip
