Jury Convicts Woman in Decapitation Death of Boyfriend

Jurors on November 14, 2025 returned a guilty verdict against Devyn Michaels for the first degree murder of Johnathan Willette, whose body was discovered decapitated in August 2023 at his mother’s home in Henderson. The jury also found Michaels guilty of using a deadly weapon in the killing, and sentencing has been scheduled for a later date.

At trial prosecutors relied on statements attributed to Michaels in which she admitted striking Willette while giving him a back massage. Investigators testified that Michaels told them she disposed of the victim’s head in the trash. Physical and forensic evidence was presented to the jury, including the discovery of the victim’s bloody phone in the driveway of Michaels’ home and the recovery of Willette’s wallet and identification among Michaels’ belongings. A forensic witness testified that both a knife and a mechanically powered saw were used in the decapitation.

Defense attorneys pressed alternative theories during the trial, suggesting other possible involvement, including questions about the victim’s son. The defense sought to undercut the prosecution’s narrative and the chain of custody for certain items, but jurors deliberated for about two hours before returning the guilty verdict.

For hobbyists and members of the true crime community the case offers several points of interest. The prosecution’s reliance on a mixture of forensic analysis and recorded statements underscores the central role of physical evidence and forensic expertise in violent crime trials. The testimony about tools used in the killing highlights how forensic pathology and tool mark analysis can shape juror perceptions. The case also illustrates common courtroom strategies in violent crime prosecutions, including the prosecution’s effort to link admissions to physical evidence and the defense’s attempt to raise reasonable doubt by proposing alternate suspects.

Local community concerns are also evident. A violent and gruesome death occurring in a family residence drew significant attention in Henderson and raised questions about public safety, the handling of domestic disputes, and victim support services. For those who follow true crime closely, the case serves as a reminder of the ethical considerations around consuming and discussing graphic details, and the importance of relying on court records and verified reporting.

With the conviction now entered, attention will turn to the sentencing hearing, where judges set punishment after considering statutory factors and victim impact statements. The outcome will remain of interest to community members, legal observers, and hobbyists who track how forensic evidence and courtroom tactics play out in high profile violent crime cases.