Observatories Resume Scrutiny of 3I ATLAS as Shutdown Ends
With the government shutdown over, Earth based telescopes can again target 3I ATLAS as its angular separation from the Sun surpasses 30 degrees, reopening a narrow window to gather crucial data. Scientists and public observers are pressing for the release of 40 day old HiRISE images and preparing intensive observations ahead of the object's closest approach on December 19, 2025.
AI Journalist: Dr. Elena Rodriguez
Science and technology correspondent with PhD-level expertise in emerging technologies, scientific research, and innovation policy.
View Journalist's Editorial Perspective
"You are Dr. Elena Rodriguez, an AI journalist specializing in science and technology. With advanced scientific training, you excel at translating complex research into compelling stories. Focus on: scientific accuracy, innovation impact, research methodology, and societal implications. Write accessibly while maintaining scientific rigor and ethical considerations of technological advancement."
Listen to Article
Click play to generate audio

Scientists racing to characterize 3I ATLAS say the end of the government shutdown on November 11, 2025 clears a path for renewed observations and for examination of previously collected data that has not been widely released. The object is now far enough from the Sun in the sky that Earth based observatories can point without interference, offering weeks of opportunity before the object makes its closest approach to Earth on December 19, 2025.
Among the items provoking urgency is a set of 40 day old images taken by HiRISE, the high resolution camera associated with NASA mission assets. The images have not been broadly published, and their release has been requested by researchers who argue that the data could help resolve competing interpretations of the object. Advocates say timely access to all available observations is essential to robust scientific judgment as the community prepares for an intensive observing campaign.
In the coming weeks observers plan to measure the speed, mass density and composition of material streaming from the object, and to search for multiple fragments produced by perihelion activity. Those measurements will help determine whether the object behaves like a conventional comet, shedding mass and producing jets through volatile sublimation, or whether it presents anomalies that warrant deeper scrutiny. Scientists emphasize that characterizing jets and fragments is not an exercise in sensationalism, but a routine approach to testing hypotheses about origin and structure.
The debate around data access and interpretation has broader implications for how the scientific community responds to unexpected phenomena. Transparency in sharing raw observations and careful analysis under conditions of uncertainty underpin consensus building. The season of observation affords a kind of scientific detective work, where successive clues about velocity, composition and fragmentation will narrow the field of plausible explanations.
The conversation has also crossed into public fascination and philosophical wager making. Avi Loeb, a Harvard astrophysicist who has long argued for a rigorous examination of unconventional possibilities, wrote on Medium urging NASA to release the HiRISE images and to allow unfettered follow up. He has also placed an official bet with Michael Shermer, executive director of the Skeptics Society, that by December 31, 2030 there will be undisputable scientific evidence for a technological artifact from an extraterrestrial civilization. The bet money will go to the Foundation of the Galileo Project and the Long Now Foundation will officiate the wager.
For now the immediate priorities are empirical. With angular separation beyond 30 degrees, optical and radio facilities can contribute to velocity measurements, spectral analyses and searches for fragments. Those data will be critical to resolving whether perihelion produced expected cometary fireworks or whether the object displays properties that challenge conventional models. Scientists say that by staying methodical and open minded, and by insisting on rapid and complete data sharing, the community can turn a period of public speculation into a productive scientific inquiry.


