3D-bioprinted cornea implant restores vision in clinical trial
A fully 3D-bioprinted, cell-based cornea implant reportedly restored vision in a Phase 1 safety trial, pointing to a scalable approach that could ease donor shortages.

A patient who was legally blind received a fully 3D-bioprinted, cell-based corneal implant (PB-001) in October 2025 at Rambam Health Care Campus in Haifa, Israel, and reportedly regained vision as part of an ongoing Phase 1 safety and tolerability trial. The procedure marks an important milestone for bioprinting and regenerative ophthalmology because the implant was created from cells derived from a single donor cornea that were expanded and printed into multiple implantable constructs, potentially multiplying the effective supply from limited donor tissue.
The clinical study will continue to monitor safety and early efficacy outcomes, with topline results expected later in 2026. The trial design focuses first on tolerability and safety signals before moving to broader efficacy measures, a common path for cell-based implants where immune response, integration, and long-term transparency of the tissue are critical metrics.
On the manufacturing side, the implant was produced in a GMP-rated facility using robotic biofabrication. That combination of good manufacturing practices, automated printing, and cell expansion workflows is central to Precise Bio’s model for scale. By expanding corneal cells from a single donor and converting them into a bioink suitable for high-throughput printing, the company aims to create dozens of constructs from tissue that would otherwise serve a single graft. This approach addresses a persistent bottleneck: a global shortage of donor corneas that leaves many patients waiting for sight-restoring surgery.
For the 3D printing community, the case highlights several practical takeaways. Progress on bioink formulation that preserves cell viability and corneal transparency will be worth following, as will developments in sterile, automated print platforms that meet regulatory expectations. The shift toward robotic biofabrication also emphasizes the importance of reproducible motion control, multi-material printheads, and inline quality controls for anything aiming to move from lab bench to clinic under GMP constraints.
The story also has implications for partnerships and financing across the bioprinting ecosystem. Follow-up funding and commercial partnerships are expected to play a key role in scaling production, validating supply chains, and advancing later-stage trials. That commercial momentum could accelerate parallel R&D in materials, print technologies, and downstream processing—areas where many designers and small firms in the hobby and prosumer space already contribute innovation.
This development does not change clinical practice overnight, but it provides a clear signal that scalable, cell-based corneal printing is moving from concept toward clinic. Watch for the Phase 1 topline data later in 2026; those results will determine whether this approach becomes a widely adopted route to multiply donor tissue and drive broader tissue-engineering scale-up across regenerative medicine.
Sources:
Know something we missed? Have a correction or additional information?
Submit a Tip

