CHAP held Dec 9 hearing, reviewed Better Waverly update and garage concept
The Commission for Historical and Architectural Preservation held a briefing and public hearing on December 9 where members reviewed a significance summary revision for the Better Waverly Historic District and a concept review for a single story garage at 2408 Madison Avenue. The meeting matters to residents because CHAP determinations shape neighborhood preservation rules, permit outcomes, and public input opportunities for local development.

The Commission for Historical and Architectural Preservation convened a briefing session from 12:00 to 1:00 p.m. on Tuesday, December 9 and followed with a regular public hearing beginning at 1:00 p.m. The meeting took place in the Phoebe Stanton Boardroom at 417 East Fayette Street, 8th Floor, and included remote access via WebEx. Participants were instructed that written testimony needed to be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on December 8 to be considered for the hearing.
Agenda subjects in the briefing included an overview of hearing business and director updates. On the consent agenda commissioners considered routine business including a significance summary revision for the Better Waverly Historic District. On the regular agenda the commission conducted a concept review for a proposed single story garage at 2408 Madison Avenue within the Eutaw Place Madison Avenue Historic District. The agenda noted that listed times were approximate and explained how items would be scheduled and heard during the session. The commission provided contact information for participation and accommodations for those seeking to engage.
CHAP decisions and reviews carry concrete implications for residents and property owners. A revision to a district significance summary can affect how alterations and new construction are evaluated under preservation standards, and a concept review signals the start of formal design scrutiny that will inform permitting and eventual approvals. For neighborhoods such as Better Waverly and Eutaw Place Madison Avenue, the commission s work influences architectural character, eligibility for historic tax incentives, and the regulatory framework for property changes.

The meeting format emphasized access through both in person attendance and remote participation, while the requirement to submit written testimony before the hearing underscores the importance of timely civic engagement. Residents with concerns about proposed work or district changes should monitor CHAP agendas and submission deadlines, and contact the commission promptly to request accommodations or to participate in future hearings.
Sources:
Know something we missed? Have a correction or additional information?
Submit a Tip

