Federal Court Vacates Wind Permitting Ban, Clearing Way for Humboldt Projects
A U.S. District Court in Massachusetts on December 9 vacated President Trump’s January 20 memorandum that had halted permitting and leasing for wind energy projects, finding the order unlawful. The decision restores federal agencies ability to resume approval activities pending appeal, potentially removing a major barrier to both offshore and onshore wind developments that include two leases off Humboldt County.

A federal judge in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts on December 9 vacated the January 20 executive memorandum that suspended permitting and leasing for wind energy projects. The ruling came after a multistate legal challenge brought by 17 states and the District of Columbia, and it declared the memorandum unlawful while restoring the ability of federal agencies to move forward with approval activities for wind projects pending appeal.
The decision immediately reopened a legal pathway that had stalled new wind development nationwide. For Humboldt County the ruling matters because two offshore leases tied to projects off the North Coast had been among those effectively frozen by the memorandum. With the order vacated, the federal government can resume routine permitting steps and proceed with administrative actions that are necessary for development to advance.
State officials weighed in in support of the outcome and environmental advocates framed the decision in terms of its economic and climate implications. At the local level the ruling could accelerate timelines for environmental review, public comment and potential construction phases, although legal appeals are expected and agencies will need to outline next steps. The vacatur does not guarantee immediate construction, but it removes a significant federal barrier that had been cited by developers and state officials as a key source of uncertainty.

The practical effects for Humboldt residents will include renewed federal and state coordination on project permitting, revived opportunities for local contracting and supply chain work if projects proceed, and a return of public engagement processes that address fisheries, marine habitat and coastal community concerns. Residents should expect agencies to publish notices and hold scoping or comment periods as reviews restart.
The ruling is likely to be appealed, so the broader regulatory environment remains unsettled. For now, however, federal agencies have the authority to resume permitting actions that could move stalled wind projects, including those linked to Humboldt County, back into active review and planning stages.
Sources:
Know something we missed? Have a correction or additional information?
Submit a Tip

